A new study shows that nearly 90% of heavy smokers say that even though they know smoking is dangerous, they still consider cigarettes their “friend.” Researchers say that emotional bond may help explain why smokers have such a hard time quitting, even with the help of nicotine-replacement therapies. “The danger of losing a friend was more threatening to them that the dangers of smoking, and they worried what would take the place of cigarettes emotionally,” write researcher Beti Thompson, PhD, of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, and colleagues. “They use smoking to comfort themselves not only in trying situations but also in situations that many people find relatively inconsequential.”
For the study, published in the December 2003 issue of Nicotine & Tobacco Research, researchers interviewed 51 heavy smokers (most were white men who smoked more than 25 cigarettes per day) about their attitudes about smoking and attempts to quit. Nearly two-thirds reported that they were physically addicted to cigarettes and more than half said the smell and taste of tobacco affected their decision to smoke. Participants also said they felt many social pressures to smoke, including pressure from the tobacco companies, family members, and smoking buddies. More than half also said that smoking relieved emotional problems and was a means to cope with stress, reduce anger, or withdraw from people or situations.
Others said social triggers got in the way of attempts to quit smoking. For example, they wondered how they could go out for a drink without smoking or couldn’t imagine giving up a cigarette at the end of a meal. On the plus side, a whopping 94% said they thought quitting would lead to improved health, but they saw giving up cigarettes as a nearly unattainable goal. “Although heavy smokers know they need to stop smoking, they feel angry that this source of physical pleasure should be taken from them,” write the researchers. “They see themselves as victims who have been duped into smoking and continued smoking.”
The suspected breast cancer risk associated with post-menopausal hormone replacement therapy may involve a type of tumor that can be hard to detect, researchers reported on Tuesday. The report from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Group Health Cooperative and the University of Washington, Seattle, looked at 705 women between the ages of 50 and 74. It found the incidence of all types of breast cancer in the group was increased by 60 to 85 percent by replacement therapy and that long-term users had a higher risk for lobular breast cancer.
An Ottawa cancer researcher has engineered a virus able to kill many types of cancer cells while leaving normal cells healthy. He hopes to begin trials in human patients in just over a year. Tests in live mice have been so successful that in some 80 per cent of cases the virus killed all the human cancer cells carried by the mice. Dr. John Bell, of the Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, has been working on the designer virus for years. In 2000, he engineered an early version of the same virus — one so successful that most cancer cells were “completely blown away.” But there was a catch: It only worked in combination with a hormone treatment. The latest version works by itself. While the history of cancer research has seen many treatments that work in mice but not in humans, Bell’s new virus has been so outstanding that he’s hopeful it will have a bright future. As well, he has been testing human cancer cells injected into mice.
Some of the worst quackery-related tragedies result from delay or failure to act. An example of a needless death involved an Oregon man who treated his basal cell carcinoma of the mouth with a mail-order remedy for 15 years. What makes this case especially tragic is that since this type of cancer almost never metastasizes, he had many years in which to correct his folly. Although badly disfigured by the growing tumor, he continued self-treatment. Overreliance upon dietary treatment is a common means by which indirect harm kills cancer sufferers. The appeal of dietary remedies is connected to folk medicine. Nearly every culture, beginning with the ancient Egyptians, has believed in the half-truth “you are what you eat.” This implies that diseases are caused by faulty diet and, conversely, can be cured by eating the “right” foods. Publicity given to epidemiological speculations about “cancer-prevention diets” encourages the belief that diet holds great promise for both prevention and treatment of cancer.
Cannabis extracts may shrink brain tumours and other cancers by blocking the growth of the blood vessels which feed them, suggests a new study. An active component of the street drug has previously been shown to improve brain tumours in rats. But now Manuel Guzmán at Complutense University, Spain, and colleagues have demonstrated how the cannabis extracts block a key chemical needed for tumours to sprout blood vessels – a process called angiogenesis. And for the first time, the team has shown the cannabinoids impede this chemical in people with the most aggressive form of brain cancer – glioblastoma multiforme. Cristina Blázquez at Complutense University, and one of the team, stresses the results are preliminary. “But it’s a good point to start and continue,” she told New Scientist.